The sixth in a series
Music, like food, is rooted
in biology, and it is like breathing, all pervasive. But are certain aspects of
our reactions to music universal as human beings? And is there some way that it can help bring us together across cultural divides?
When PAN wandered the
mountains of ancient Greece, did the shepherds tending their
flocks, or even the wood-nymphs (including Syrinx) take to his panpipe music at
their first listen?
Modern science tells us that
music is a fundamental part of our evolution, as humans probably sang before
they spoke in syntactically guided sentences. Music is strongly linked to
motivation and human social contact. While only a few people may be able
to play music, almost all of us can at least sing or hum a tune.
A team of researchers from McGill University Montreal, Technische
Universität Berlin, and the University of Montreal arrived at this conclusion
after traveling deep into the rainforest to play music to a very isolated
group of people, the Mbenzélé Pygmies, who live without access to radio,
television or the internet.
They then compared how the Mbenzélé responded
both to their own music and to unfamiliar Western music, with the way that a group of
Canadians responded to the same pieces.
The researchers explain, in a recent
article in Frontiers in Psychology, that although the groups
felt quite differently about whether specific pieces of music made them feel
good or bad, their subjective and physiological responses to how exciting or
calming they found the music to be appeared to be universal.
![]() |
| Dr. Hauke Egermann |
"Our major discovery is that listeners
from very different groups both responded to how exciting or calming they felt
the music to be in similar ways," says Hauke Egermann, who is currently
based at the Technische Universität in Berlin.
Can people learn to love music they don’t like?
We all can readily identify
music we hate. But can we intentionally transform our visceral response to different types of music?
Researchers
at Australia's University of Melbourne say that the more dissonance (which they
describe as "perceived roughness, harshness, unpleasantness, or difficulty
in listening to the sound") that we hear in music, the less we enjoy said
music.
However,
the more we're exposed to a certain kind of music — either through intentional
engagement or simple osmosis in whatever culture we're immersed in — the more
we like that music.
The
team played both "pure tones" and various chords for participants --
a mixed group of trained musicians studying at the school's conservatory and
members of the general public -- and had them rate the sounds for perceived
dissonance, and for familiarity, on a five-point scale.
Trained
musicians, perhaps predictably, were more sensitive to dissonance than lay
listeners. But they also found that when listeners hadn't previously
encountered a certain chord, they found it nearly impossible to hear the individual
notes that comprised it. Where this ability was lacking, the chords sounded
dissonant, and thus, unpleasant.
![]() |
| Sarah Wilson |
From a practical standpoint, the results seem to suggest that we can train ourselves to better appreciate music. This includes the unfamiliar traditions, (assuming this is not just a clever way of promoting the Melbourne Conservatorium of Music) is great news for those who've been wanting to get into jazz or other musical genres.
This is reason enough for inquisitive people to "sample" classical music in non-traditional venues or based on various forms of popular culture such as motion pictures, themed programs or Broadway musicals. There may be a great opportunity to grow audiences for classical music, based on the way we all process music in our brains.
We're sure PAN will be right in the mix, as he tries to use these new scientific insights in his romantics efforts in the woods and fields of Arcadia.




No comments:
Post a Comment